Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
ITAT held that notices issued u/s 143(2) dated 17/08/2018 and 23/08/2018 were invalid for failing to specify whether scrutiny was "limited" (CASS), "complete" (CASS) or "complete manual" as mandated by the Board format notified 23.06.2017; the CBDT instruction under s.119 is mandatory and binds income-tax authorities. The Tribunal affirmed that the revenue bears the burden to demonstrate strict compliance with the prescribed CASS/notice format and approval procedures. Consequently the assessment order framed u/s 143(3) dated 24/12/2019 was quashed for lack of jurisdiction due to non-compliance with mandatory CBDT instructions.
ITAT held that notices issued u/s 143(2) dated 17/08/2018 and 23/08/2018 were invalid for failing to specify whether scrutiny was "limited" (CASS), "complete" (CASS) or "complete manual" as mandated by the Board format notified 23.06.2017; the CBDT instruction under s.119 is mandatory and binds income-tax authorities. The Tribunal affirmed that the revenue bears the burden to demonstrate strict compliance with the prescribed CASS/notice format and approval procedures. Consequently the assessment order framed u/s 143(3) dated 24/12/2019 was quashed for lack of jurisdiction due to non-compliance with mandatory CBDT instructions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
