Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The AT dismissed the appeals, upholding the Adjudicating...
Appeals dismissed; benami transaction upheld as appellant failed to explain Rs.4.13 crore construction spending and ₹1.1 crore consideration s.24(1) s.63
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The AT dismissed the appeals, upholding the Adjudicating Authority's finding of a benami transaction. The Tribunal concluded the Respondent established a prima facie case and discharged the onus, shifting evidentiary burden to the Appellant who failed to satisfactorily account for source of funds or legitimate consideration; expenditure of Rs. 4.13 crore on construction while legal title remained with the beneficial owner and minimal consideration post-execution (₹1.1 crore) supported the benami finding. The Tribunal held the Provisional Attachment Order valid: notice under s.24(1) was issued, prior approval of the Approving Authority was obtained (albeit before notice), and any procedural defect was saved by s.63, rendering the appeals devoid of merit.
The AT dismissed the appeals, upholding the Adjudicating Authority's finding of a benami transaction. The Tribunal concluded the Respondent established a prima facie case and discharged the onus, shifting evidentiary burden to the Appellant who failed to satisfactorily account for source of funds or legitimate consideration; expenditure of Rs. 4.13 crore on construction while legal title remained with the beneficial owner and minimal consideration post-execution (₹1.1 crore) supported the benami finding. The Tribunal held the Provisional Attachment Order valid: notice under s.24(1) was issued, prior approval of the Approving Authority was obtained (albeit before notice), and any procedural defect was saved by s.63, rendering the appeals devoid of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.