Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT upheld the impugned Order-in-Original revoking the suspension of the customs broker licence, dismissing the appeal. The Tribunal found the adjudicating authority had duly considered the allegations in the SCN under CBLR, 2013 and had not acted without appreciation of the purported enormity of the offence. The appellant's contention that the revocation should have awaited the outcome of an inquiry was rejected as unsustainable, given the statutory timelines for issuance of SCN, appointment of an inquiry officer and disposal of proceedings under CBLR. There being no material to vitiate the impugned order, the appeal was dismissed and the revocation upheld.
CESTAT upheld the impugned Order-in-Original revoking the suspension of the customs broker licence, dismissing the appeal. The Tribunal found the adjudicating authority had duly considered the allegations in the SCN under CBLR, 2013 and had not acted without appreciation of the purported enormity of the offence. The appellant's contention that the revocation should have awaited the outcome of an inquiry was rejected as unsustainable, given the statutory timelines for issuance of SCN, appointment of an inquiry officer and disposal of proceedings under CBLR. There being no material to vitiate the impugned order, the appeal was dismissed and the revocation upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
