Refund claim dismissed as time-barred under s.142(5); non-obstante clause read restrictively, merits not decided, self-assessment payments not mere de...
Assessee's project-completion revenue recognition upheld; income addition deleted under Guidance Note/AS-9 and percentage-completion rules as complian...
CESTAT held that the appellant's appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with statutory preconditions for duty drawback. The Tribunal found non-fulfilment of Rule 4(a) and, critically, Rule 5 of the Re-export of Imported Goods (Drawback of Customs Duties) Rules, 1995; the latter breach is fatal and precludes grant of drawback. While conversion of a free shipping bill to a drawback shipping bill may be directed where only Rule 4(a) is contravened, no relief is available here and there is no statutory mechanism to condone non-compliance after the twelve-month period. Consequently, the claim for drawback is refused and the appeal stands dismissed.
CESTAT held that the appellant's appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with statutory preconditions for duty drawback. The Tribunal found non-fulfilment of Rule 4(a) and, critically, Rule 5 of the Re-export of Imported Goods (Drawback of Customs Duties) Rules, 1995; the latter breach is fatal and precludes grant of drawback. While conversion of a free shipping bill to a drawback shipping bill may be directed where only Rule 4(a) is contravened, no relief is available here and there is no statutory mechanism to condone non-compliance after the twelve-month period. Consequently, the claim for drawback is refused and the appeal stands dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.