Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT dismissed the application for condonation of delay of 512 days and refused to condone the delayed filing of the appeal. The Tribunal found dispositive evidence-an acknowledgment letter from the HUF's Karta confirming receipt of the SCN on 9.12.2021 and seeking time to reply-matching the address in the appeal and SCN, and the subsequent recovery notice sent to the same address, which established actual notice of proceedings. The appellant's plea of non-receipt was held factually incorrect; accordingly the AT found no merit in excusing the delay and rejected the prayer for condonation, leaving the substantive challenge to the SEBI (PFUTP) allegations unadmitted for adjudication.
The AT dismissed the application for condonation of delay of 512 days and refused to condone the delayed filing of the appeal. The Tribunal found dispositive evidence-an acknowledgment letter from the HUF's Karta confirming receipt of the SCN on 9.12.2021 and seeking time to reply-matching the address in the appeal and SCN, and the subsequent recovery notice sent to the same address, which established actual notice of proceedings. The appellant's plea of non-receipt was held factually incorrect; accordingly the AT found no merit in excusing the delay and rejected the prayer for condonation, leaving the substantive challenge to the SEBI (PFUTP) allegations unadmitted for adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
