Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT quashed the impugned order under Section 123 of the IBC and allowed the appeals, holding that non-submission of a repayment plan led to proceedings under Section 114 read with relevant IBBI regulations but did not preclude the appellants from filing a plan. The appellants are granted liberty to submit a repayment plan under Section 106 read with the undertaking by the intervenor FI; the intervenor FI has agreed to withdraw its Section 123 petition while reserving its rights under the IBC, conditional on grant of further time and consideration of any subsequently submitted plan. The appeals succeed subject to compliance with conditions specified in the companion appeals.
NCLAT quashed the impugned order under Section 123 of the IBC and allowed the appeals, holding that non-submission of a repayment plan led to proceedings under Section 114 read with relevant IBBI regulations but did not preclude the appellants from filing a plan. The appellants are granted liberty to submit a repayment plan under Section 106 read with the undertaking by the intervenor FI; the intervenor FI has agreed to withdraw its Section 123 petition while reserving its rights under the IBC, conditional on grant of further time and consideration of any subsequently submitted plan. The appeals succeed subject to compliance with conditions specified in the companion appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.