Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The SC held that the arresting authorities violated Article 22(1) and Section 50 CrPC (now s.47 BNSS) by failing to furnish written grounds of arrest to the appellants, rendering the arrest and consequent remand illegal and entitling the appellants to be set at liberty. The Court affirmed that informing grounds of arrest is a mandatory constitutional safeguard to enable defence and legal consultation; while oral communication is permissible in exigent circumstances (e.g., flagrante delicto), a written statement in a language understood by the arrestee must be provided within a reasonable time and, in any event, not later than two hours before production for remand. Appeal disposed.
The SC held that the arresting authorities violated Article 22(1) and Section 50 CrPC (now s.47 BNSS) by failing to furnish written grounds of arrest to the appellants, rendering the arrest and consequent remand illegal and entitling the appellants to be set at liberty. The Court affirmed that informing grounds of arrest is a mandatory constitutional safeguard to enable defence and legal consultation; while oral communication is permissible in exigent circumstances (e.g., flagrante delicto), a written statement in a language understood by the arrestee must be provided within a reasonable time and, in any event, not later than two hours before production for remand. Appeal disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
