Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the imported seaweed...
Imported seaweed extract provisionally released on bond only; declaratory rejection set aside; appellate decision due within section 128-A(4-A) three months
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the imported seaweed extract lacks constituents of a plant growth regulator and has been historically classified under Chapter 31; the declaratory rejection is set aside insofar as provisional relief is concerned. The importer is entitled to provisional assessment and release of the goods on furnishing a bond alone, without requirement of a bank guarantee, as an interim measure pending appellate determination. The relief is subject to the appellate authority's final adjudication; if the appellate outcome is adverse the importer may pursue available remedies. The appellate authority is directed to dispose of the appeal on merits within three months in accordance with section 128-A(4-A).
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the imported seaweed extract lacks constituents of a plant growth regulator and has been historically classified under Chapter 31; the declaratory rejection is set aside insofar as provisional relief is concerned. The importer is entitled to provisional assessment and release of the goods on furnishing a bond alone, without requirement of a bank guarantee, as an interim measure pending appellate determination. The relief is subject to the appellate authority's final adjudication; if the appellate outcome is adverse the importer may pursue available remedies. The appellate authority is directed to dispose of the appeal on merits within three months in accordance with section 128-A(4-A).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.