Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
861 to 880 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC directed removal of a filing lacuna in the online portal and ordered acceptance of the anonymized petitioner's statutory appeal under s.107 UPGST, holding that procedural mechanisms must not preclude access to the appellate forum. The court mandated GSTN to modify its software to permit online filing where digital records show a 'Nil' disputed liability, while allowing registration of such appeals with a note that maintainability is for the Appellate Authority to decide. As interim relief, the petitioner was permitted to file the appeal physically within two weeks; the Appeal Authority must register, entertain and decide the appeal on merits expeditiously, without objections as to limitation or mode of filing. Petition disposed.
HC directed removal of a filing lacuna in the online portal and ordered acceptance of the anonymized petitioner's statutory appeal under s.107 UPGST, holding that procedural mechanisms must not preclude access to the appellate forum. The court mandated GSTN to modify its software to permit online filing where digital records show a 'Nil' disputed liability, while allowing registration of such appeals with a note that maintainability is for the Appellate Authority to decide. As interim relief, the petitioner was permitted to file the appeal physically within two weeks; the Appeal Authority must register, entertain and decide the appeal on merits expeditiously, without objections as to limitation or mode of filing. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.