Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC partially dismissed the petition under Section 161 of the respective GST enactments challenging levy of penalty under Section 74(9) for belated payment of admitted SGST/CGST. The petitioner, having discharged the tax on specified dates, was granted limited liberty to file a statutory appeal against the impugned order dated 14.08.2023 within 30 days from receipt of this order, conditional upon deposit of 25% of the disputed tax amount plus interest attributable to the belated payment. Upon production of proof of such payment, the Appellate Authority is directed to entertain and decide the appeal on merits without reverting to the question of limitation. Petition disposed.
HC partially dismissed the petition under Section 161 of the respective GST enactments challenging levy of penalty under Section 74(9) for belated payment of admitted SGST/CGST. The petitioner, having discharged the tax on specified dates, was granted limited liberty to file a statutory appeal against the impugned order dated 14.08.2023 within 30 days from receipt of this order, conditional upon deposit of 25% of the disputed tax amount plus interest attributable to the belated payment. Upon production of proof of such payment, the Appellate Authority is directed to entertain and decide the appeal on merits without reverting to the question of limitation. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
