Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
481 to 500 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC partially dismissed the petition under Section 161 of the respective GST enactments challenging levy of penalty under Section 74(9) for belated payment of admitted SGST/CGST. The petitioner, having discharged the tax on specified dates, was granted limited liberty to file a statutory appeal against the impugned order dated 14.08.2023 within 30 days from receipt of this order, conditional upon deposit of 25% of the disputed tax amount plus interest attributable to the belated payment. Upon production of proof of such payment, the Appellate Authority is directed to entertain and decide the appeal on merits without reverting to the question of limitation. Petition disposed.
HC partially dismissed the petition under Section 161 of the respective GST enactments challenging levy of penalty under Section 74(9) for belated payment of admitted SGST/CGST. The petitioner, having discharged the tax on specified dates, was granted limited liberty to file a statutory appeal against the impugned order dated 14.08.2023 within 30 days from receipt of this order, conditional upon deposit of 25% of the disputed tax amount plus interest attributable to the belated payment. Upon production of proof of such payment, the Appellate Authority is directed to entertain and decide the appeal on merits without reverting to the question of limitation. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.