Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
HC partially dismissed the petition under Section 161 of the respective GST enactments challenging levy of penalty under Section 74(9) for belated payment of admitted SGST/CGST. The petitioner, having discharged the tax on specified dates, was granted limited liberty to file a statutory appeal against the impugned order dated 14.08.2023 within 30 days from receipt of this order, conditional upon deposit of 25% of the disputed tax amount plus interest attributable to the belated payment. Upon production of proof of such payment, the Appellate Authority is directed to entertain and decide the appeal on merits without reverting to the question of limitation. Petition disposed.
HC partially dismissed the petition under Section 161 of the respective GST enactments challenging levy of penalty under Section 74(9) for belated payment of admitted SGST/CGST. The petitioner, having discharged the tax on specified dates, was granted limited liberty to file a statutory appeal against the impugned order dated 14.08.2023 within 30 days from receipt of this order, conditional upon deposit of 25% of the disputed tax amount plus interest attributable to the belated payment. Upon production of proof of such payment, the Appellate Authority is directed to entertain and decide the appeal on merits without reverting to the question of limitation. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
