Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The HC granted a partial stay of the impugned order blocking electronic credit ledger, limiting relief to 50% of the petitioner's assessed tax liability of Rs. 23,75,480 (i.e., Rs. 11,87,740). The negative blocking of Rs. 48,93,551 remains but is reduced effectively to Rs. 37,05,811 pending further consideration; the petitioner is authorized to debit Rs. 11,87,740 from the blocked credit and must replenish the full blocked amount of Rs. 48,93,551 before the next tax payment due date. The negative blocking shall continue until filing of the next monthly return and payment or until an order under Rule 86(2) or Rule 86A supersedes it. Petition disposed.
The HC granted a partial stay of the impugned order blocking electronic credit ledger, limiting relief to 50% of the petitioner's assessed tax liability of Rs. 23,75,480 (i.e., Rs. 11,87,740). The negative blocking of Rs. 48,93,551 remains but is reduced effectively to Rs. 37,05,811 pending further consideration; the petitioner is authorized to debit Rs. 11,87,740 from the blocked credit and must replenish the full blocked amount of Rs. 48,93,551 before the next tax payment due date. The negative blocking shall continue until filing of the next monthly return and payment or until an order under Rule 86(2) or Rule 86A supersedes it. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
