Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
The HC granted a partial stay of the impugned order blocking electronic credit ledger, limiting relief to 50% of the petitioner's assessed tax liability of Rs. 23,75,480 (i.e., Rs. 11,87,740). The negative blocking of Rs. 48,93,551 remains but is reduced effectively to Rs. 37,05,811 pending further consideration; the petitioner is authorized to debit Rs. 11,87,740 from the blocked credit and must replenish the full blocked amount of Rs. 48,93,551 before the next tax payment due date. The negative blocking shall continue until filing of the next monthly return and payment or until an order under Rule 86(2) or Rule 86A supersedes it. Petition disposed.
The HC granted a partial stay of the impugned order blocking electronic credit ledger, limiting relief to 50% of the petitioner's assessed tax liability of Rs. 23,75,480 (i.e., Rs. 11,87,740). The negative blocking of Rs. 48,93,551 remains but is reduced effectively to Rs. 37,05,811 pending further consideration; the petitioner is authorized to debit Rs. 11,87,740 from the blocked credit and must replenish the full blocked amount of Rs. 48,93,551 before the next tax payment due date. The negative blocking shall continue until filing of the next monthly return and payment or until an order under Rule 86(2) or Rule 86A supersedes it. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.