Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The HC granted a partial stay of the impugned order blocking electronic credit ledger, limiting relief to 50% of the petitioner's assessed tax liability of Rs. 23,75,480 (i.e., Rs. 11,87,740). The negative blocking of Rs. 48,93,551 remains but is reduced effectively to Rs. 37,05,811 pending further consideration; the petitioner is authorized to debit Rs. 11,87,740 from the blocked credit and must replenish the full blocked amount of Rs. 48,93,551 before the next tax payment due date. The negative blocking shall continue until filing of the next monthly return and payment or until an order under Rule 86(2) or Rule 86A supersedes it. Petition disposed.
The HC granted a partial stay of the impugned order blocking electronic credit ledger, limiting relief to 50% of the petitioner's assessed tax liability of Rs. 23,75,480 (i.e., Rs. 11,87,740). The negative blocking of Rs. 48,93,551 remains but is reduced effectively to Rs. 37,05,811 pending further consideration; the petitioner is authorized to debit Rs. 11,87,740 from the blocked credit and must replenish the full blocked amount of Rs. 48,93,551 before the next tax payment due date. The negative blocking shall continue until filing of the next monthly return and payment or until an order under Rule 86(2) or Rule 86A supersedes it. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
