Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC quashed and set aside the impugned orders and allowed the petition by way of remand. The court held that the petitioner had specifically denied any discrepancy between Form GSTR-3B and Form GSTR-2A and that the adjudicating authority failed to address that contention and breached the audi alteram partem principle by not affording an effective hearing. The matter is remitted to Respondent No.3 for de novo adjudication on merits, including consideration of the petitioner's contention regarding no difference in demand arising from reversal of input tax credit or increase in output tax liability, after providing the petitioner a fair opportunity of hearing.
The HC quashed and set aside the impugned orders and allowed the petition by way of remand. The court held that the petitioner had specifically denied any discrepancy between Form GSTR-3B and Form GSTR-2A and that the adjudicating authority failed to address that contention and breached the audi alteram partem principle by not affording an effective hearing. The matter is remitted to Respondent No.3 for de novo adjudication on merits, including consideration of the petitioner's contention regarding no difference in demand arising from reversal of input tax credit or increase in output tax liability, after providing the petitioner a fair opportunity of hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
