Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
AAR holds that input tax charged on Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO)/renewable diesel may be claimed as input tax credit by the applicant only if all statutory conditions and restrictions under Section 16 read with Section 17 of the CGST Act, 2017 are satisfied; availability is case-specific and subject to applicable rules framed under Section 164. The Authority affirms that imposition of uniform statutory restrictions on ITC is constitutionally valid and that ITC is not an absolute right. The taxpayer bears the evidentiary burden to establish admissibility of credit through prescribed records and payments. The AAR declines to adjudicate on technical or legal classification of HVO as fuel, as that question falls outside its remit.
AAR holds that input tax charged on Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO)/renewable diesel may be claimed as input tax credit by the applicant only if all statutory conditions and restrictions under Section 16 read with Section 17 of the CGST Act, 2017 are satisfied; availability is case-specific and subject to applicable rules framed under Section 164. The Authority affirms that imposition of uniform statutory restrictions on ITC is constitutionally valid and that ITC is not an absolute right. The taxpayer bears the evidentiary burden to establish admissibility of credit through prescribed records and payments. The AAR declines to adjudicate on technical or legal classification of HVO as fuel, as that question falls outside its remit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.