Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
AAR holds that input tax charged on Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO)/renewable diesel may be claimed as input tax credit by the applicant only if all statutory conditions and restrictions under Section 16 read with Section 17 of the CGST Act, 2017 are satisfied; availability is case-specific and subject to applicable rules framed under Section 164. The Authority affirms that imposition of uniform statutory restrictions on ITC is constitutionally valid and that ITC is not an absolute right. The taxpayer bears the evidentiary burden to establish admissibility of credit through prescribed records and payments. The AAR declines to adjudicate on technical or legal classification of HVO as fuel, as that question falls outside its remit.
AAR holds that input tax charged on Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO)/renewable diesel may be claimed as input tax credit by the applicant only if all statutory conditions and restrictions under Section 16 read with Section 17 of the CGST Act, 2017 are satisfied; availability is case-specific and subject to applicable rules framed under Section 164. The Authority affirms that imposition of uniform statutory restrictions on ITC is constitutionally valid and that ITC is not an absolute right. The taxpayer bears the evidentiary burden to establish admissibility of credit through prescribed records and payments. The AAR declines to adjudicate on technical or legal classification of HVO as fuel, as that question falls outside its remit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.