Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC directed the Tax Recovery Officer to vacate and release the attached property within four weeks, holding that where the highest fact-finding authority's order has attained finality and the assessee has satisfied the assessed arrears, continued attachment is impermissible. The court emphasised that Section 225(2) of the IT Act mandates the TRO to give effect to appellate or other final orders, and observed that the Revenue, if successful on any pending appeal, remains entitled to pursue recovery thereafter. Accordingly, the impugned attachment dated 15.07.2022 was ordered to be lifted forthwith, the TRO to comply within the specified period.
The HC directed the Tax Recovery Officer to vacate and release the attached property within four weeks, holding that where the highest fact-finding authority's order has attained finality and the assessee has satisfied the assessed arrears, continued attachment is impermissible. The court emphasised that Section 225(2) of the IT Act mandates the TRO to give effect to appellate or other final orders, and observed that the Revenue, if successful on any pending appeal, remains entitled to pursue recovery thereafter. Accordingly, the impugned attachment dated 15.07.2022 was ordered to be lifted forthwith, the TRO to comply within the specified period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.