Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal and directed deletion of the disputed addition of Rs.57,21,300 which had been made by CPC and confirmed by the first appellate authority, finding the figure in the initial Form 10B to be an inadvertent arithmetical error corrected by a revised Form 10B (and supporting Form 10BB) reflecting deemed income under section 11(3) of the Act as Rs.2,06,06,960. The Tribunal further accepted the taxpayer's alternative contention that the Form 10B filing requirement cannot be negated by reference to the Rs.5 crore turnover threshold, construing Rule 17B as not subject to that monetary limit, and directed the assessing officer to delete the impugned addition accordingly.
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal and directed deletion of the disputed addition of Rs.57,21,300 which had been made by CPC and confirmed by the first appellate authority, finding the figure in the initial Form 10B to be an inadvertent arithmetical error corrected by a revised Form 10B (and supporting Form 10BB) reflecting deemed income under section 11(3) of the Act as Rs.2,06,06,960. The Tribunal further accepted the taxpayer's alternative contention that the Form 10B filing requirement cannot be negated by reference to the Rs.5 crore turnover threshold, construing Rule 17B as not subject to that monetary limit, and directed the assessing officer to delete the impugned addition accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.