ESOP expenditure allowed as FMV difference; long-term capital gain issue sent back for collector rate determination; deferred income additions disallo...
Appeal allowed; impugned order quashed as regulator failed to prove nexus or manipulative scheme; sale genuine - s.12A(a)-(c), Regs 3(a)-(d),4(1),4(2)...
Appellant's ring-back tone service held OIDAR, taxable domestically for 01.07.2012-31.07.2016; liability confirmed, penalties vacated, remanded for re...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9181 to 9200 of 96406 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld the AO's disallowance of deductions claimed as "impairment of assets" and "abnormal loss" on spares, holding such amounts relate to depreciable fixed assets and are not allowable as revenue expenditure; the Tribunal directed the AO to permit adjustment of those amounts in the relevant block of assets and to allow consequent depreciation. Concurrently, ITAT quashed the penalty under section 270A for misreporting, finding no misrepresentation, suppression, false entry or unsupported claim, and noting absence of requisite findings by the AO; grounds challenging the disallowance were dismissed while the penalty was cancelled.
ITAT upheld the AO's disallowance of deductions claimed as "impairment of assets" and "abnormal loss" on spares, holding such amounts relate to depreciable fixed assets and are not allowable as revenue expenditure; the Tribunal directed the AO to permit adjustment of those amounts in the relevant block of assets and to allow consequent depreciation. Concurrently, ITAT quashed the penalty under section 270A for misreporting, finding no misrepresentation, suppression, false entry or unsupported claim, and noting absence of requisite findings by the AO; grounds challenging the disallowance were dismissed while the penalty was cancelled.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.