Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the appeal and directed the AO to admit exemption under s.11/12 for the appellant for AY 2018-19 on the basis of the first proviso to s.12A(2), holding that subsequent grant of registration u/s 12AA (during pending assessment) entitles the trust to s.11/12 benefits for the preceding year subject to verification and no change in objects/activities; the tribunal rejected the CIT(A)'s reasons, noting the proviso was operative for the relevant year, and remitted the matter to the AO to afford the appellant opportunity to furnish particulars and to compute and verify the admissible exemption (appeal allowed for statistical purposes).
ITAT allowed the appeal and directed the AO to admit exemption under s.11/12 for the appellant for AY 2018-19 on the basis of the first proviso to s.12A(2), holding that subsequent grant of registration u/s 12AA (during pending assessment) entitles the trust to s.11/12 benefits for the preceding year subject to verification and no change in objects/activities; the tribunal rejected the CIT(A)'s reasons, noting the proviso was operative for the relevant year, and remitted the matter to the AO to afford the appellant opportunity to furnish particulars and to compute and verify the admissible exemption (appeal allowed for statistical purposes).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.