Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that the impugned Order-in-Original and Order-in-Appeal were vitiated by breach of audi alteram partem and lack of proof of service, noting conflicting dates and adjournments contrary to the statutory regimen governing hearings. The Court found the petitioner was not afforded a fair hearing and that procedural irregularities (including multiple contrary issuance dates and absence of notice) rendered the proceedings invalid. The impugned orders are quashed and set aside, and the matter is remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for de novo adjudication in accordance with law after affording the Petitioner adequate opportunity of hearing. Petition allowed by way of remand.
The HC held that the impugned Order-in-Original and Order-in-Appeal were vitiated by breach of audi alteram partem and lack of proof of service, noting conflicting dates and adjournments contrary to the statutory regimen governing hearings. The Court found the petitioner was not afforded a fair hearing and that procedural irregularities (including multiple contrary issuance dates and absence of notice) rendered the proceedings invalid. The impugned orders are quashed and set aside, and the matter is remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for de novo adjudication in accordance with law after affording the Petitioner adequate opportunity of hearing. Petition allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.