Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
ITAT set aside additions under s.69A treating unsecured loans as unexplained money and allowed the assessee's appeal. The Tribunal found that the assessee furnished creditor details, ITR acknowledgements, accounts, bank statements and confirmations, and complied with s.133(6) and s.131 summonses, thereby discharging the initial onus; the burden accordingly shifted to the revenue, which failed to controvert or impugn the documents or point to any material defect. The AO's treatment of raised unsecured loans as unexplained cash was held contrary to the statutory scope of s.69A and the CIT(A)'s confirmation of that view was reversed.
ITAT set aside additions under s.69A treating unsecured loans as unexplained money and allowed the assessee's appeal. The Tribunal found that the assessee furnished creditor details, ITR acknowledgements, accounts, bank statements and confirmations, and complied with s.133(6) and s.131 summonses, thereby discharging the initial onus; the burden accordingly shifted to the revenue, which failed to controvert or impugn the documents or point to any material defect. The AO's treatment of raised unsecured loans as unexplained cash was held contrary to the statutory scope of s.69A and the CIT(A)'s confirmation of that view was reversed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
