Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT set aside additions under s.69A treating unsecured loans as unexplained money and allowed the assessee's appeal. The Tribunal found that the assessee furnished creditor details, ITR acknowledgements, accounts, bank statements and confirmations, and complied with s.133(6) and s.131 summonses, thereby discharging the initial onus; the burden accordingly shifted to the revenue, which failed to controvert or impugn the documents or point to any material defect. The AO's treatment of raised unsecured loans as unexplained cash was held contrary to the statutory scope of s.69A and the CIT(A)'s confirmation of that view was reversed.
ITAT set aside additions under s.69A treating unsecured loans as unexplained money and allowed the assessee's appeal. The Tribunal found that the assessee furnished creditor details, ITR acknowledgements, accounts, bank statements and confirmations, and complied with s.133(6) and s.131 summonses, thereby discharging the initial onus; the burden accordingly shifted to the revenue, which failed to controvert or impugn the documents or point to any material defect. The AO's treatment of raised unsecured loans as unexplained cash was held contrary to the statutory scope of s.69A and the CIT(A)'s confirmation of that view was reversed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
