Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s allowance of rectification under s.154, holding that the AO's refusal to grant deduction under s.36(1)(vii) for non-rural debts written off constituted a mistake apparent from record. The Tribunal accepted that a subsequent HC decision clarified the correct legal position and, consistent with administrative guidance recognizing subsequent SC interpretations as rectifiable errors, the assessment completed without that precedent was defective. The AO's rejection was overturned, the rectification granted, and the deduction allowed to the assessee. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed.
ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s allowance of rectification under s.154, holding that the AO's refusal to grant deduction under s.36(1)(vii) for non-rural debts written off constituted a mistake apparent from record. The Tribunal accepted that a subsequent HC decision clarified the correct legal position and, consistent with administrative guidance recognizing subsequent SC interpretations as rectifiable errors, the assessment completed without that precedent was defective. The AO's rejection was overturned, the rectification granted, and the deduction allowed to the assessee. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
