Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld denial of deduction under s.54F for sums expended after acquisition of the dwelling, concluding such outlays constituted post-purchase renovation/modification and thus do not qualify as purchase of a new residential unit for s.54F relief. The tribunal affirmed lower authorities' rejection of the claim. Conversely, ITAT directed the AO to allow deduction under s.80C upon verification of the produced LIC premium receipt, ordering grant of the 80C claim accordingly and treating that ground as allowed for statistical purposes. The decision leaves the s.54F disallowance intact and mandates ministerial compliance by the AO regarding the 80C deduction.
ITAT upheld denial of deduction under s.54F for sums expended after acquisition of the dwelling, concluding such outlays constituted post-purchase renovation/modification and thus do not qualify as purchase of a new residential unit for s.54F relief. The tribunal affirmed lower authorities' rejection of the claim. Conversely, ITAT directed the AO to allow deduction under s.80C upon verification of the produced LIC premium receipt, ordering grant of the 80C claim accordingly and treating that ground as allowed for statistical purposes. The decision leaves the s.54F disallowance intact and mandates ministerial compliance by the AO regarding the 80C deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
