Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld denial of deduction under s.54F for sums expended after acquisition of the dwelling, concluding such outlays constituted post-purchase renovation/modification and thus do not qualify as purchase of a new residential unit for s.54F relief. The tribunal affirmed lower authorities' rejection of the claim. Conversely, ITAT directed the AO to allow deduction under s.80C upon verification of the produced LIC premium receipt, ordering grant of the 80C claim accordingly and treating that ground as allowed for statistical purposes. The decision leaves the s.54F disallowance intact and mandates ministerial compliance by the AO regarding the 80C deduction.
ITAT upheld denial of deduction under s.54F for sums expended after acquisition of the dwelling, concluding such outlays constituted post-purchase renovation/modification and thus do not qualify as purchase of a new residential unit for s.54F relief. The tribunal affirmed lower authorities' rejection of the claim. Conversely, ITAT directed the AO to allow deduction under s.80C upon verification of the produced LIC premium receipt, ordering grant of the 80C claim accordingly and treating that ground as allowed for statistical purposes. The decision leaves the s.54F disallowance intact and mandates ministerial compliance by the AO regarding the 80C deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
