Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal, holding that vehicle running and maintenance expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes and also constituted employee perquisites subject to withholding tax; therefore such expenditures are deductible. The Tribunal affirmed the earlier conclusion of the CIT(A) for the prior assessment year and declined to disturb that finding in the impugned year. Club subscription expenditures, treated as employee perquisites and previously examined by the CIT(A), were similarly held allowable where contemporaneous records and explanations were furnished to the AO; items earlier disallowed for lack of particulars were accepted on production of requisite details. The appeal was allowed.
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal, holding that vehicle running and maintenance expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes and also constituted employee perquisites subject to withholding tax; therefore such expenditures are deductible. The Tribunal affirmed the earlier conclusion of the CIT(A) for the prior assessment year and declined to disturb that finding in the impugned year. Club subscription expenditures, treated as employee perquisites and previously examined by the CIT(A), were similarly held allowable where contemporaneous records and explanations were furnished to the AO; items earlier disallowed for lack of particulars were accepted on production of requisite details. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.