Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal, holding that vehicle running and maintenance expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes and also constituted employee perquisites subject to withholding tax; therefore such expenditures are deductible. The Tribunal affirmed the earlier conclusion of the CIT(A) for the prior assessment year and declined to disturb that finding in the impugned year. Club subscription expenditures, treated as employee perquisites and previously examined by the CIT(A), were similarly held allowable where contemporaneous records and explanations were furnished to the AO; items earlier disallowed for lack of particulars were accepted on production of requisite details. The appeal was allowed.
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal, holding that vehicle running and maintenance expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes and also constituted employee perquisites subject to withholding tax; therefore such expenditures are deductible. The Tribunal affirmed the earlier conclusion of the CIT(A) for the prior assessment year and declined to disturb that finding in the impugned year. Club subscription expenditures, treated as employee perquisites and previously examined by the CIT(A), were similarly held allowable where contemporaneous records and explanations were furnished to the AO; items earlier disallowed for lack of particulars were accepted on production of requisite details. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.