Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Bd. held that the Noticee failed to conduct annual audits for FY 2021-22 and 2022-23 in breach of Reg. 25(3) of the RA Regulations and Clauses 2 and 7 of the Code of Conduct in the Third Schedule to Reg. 24(2); audits for those years were completed only after the regulator's inspection request, whereas the audit for FY 2023-24 was timely. The Bd. found the failures constituted contraventions attracting liability under s.15EB of the SEBI Act and, having considered remedial steps taken, imposed a monetary penalty in exercise of powers under s.15J, concluding the Noticee is liable to pay the prescribed penalty.
Bd. held that the Noticee failed to conduct annual audits for FY 2021-22 and 2022-23 in breach of Reg. 25(3) of the RA Regulations and Clauses 2 and 7 of the Code of Conduct in the Third Schedule to Reg. 24(2); audits for those years were completed only after the regulator's inspection request, whereas the audit for FY 2023-24 was timely. The Bd. found the failures constituted contraventions attracting liability under s.15EB of the SEBI Act and, having considered remedial steps taken, imposed a monetary penalty in exercise of powers under s.15J, concluding the Noticee is liable to pay the prescribed penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.