Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The SC dismisses the appellant's objections under Section 47 CPC and the stay application under Order XXI Rule 29, thereby permitting enforcement of the arbitral award to proceed. On maintainability, the Court considered and decided the objections on merits, finding no prima facie case of fraud or breach of fiduciary duty sufficient to render the award inexecutable. Applying the business judgment rule, the Court held that senior management's decisions fell within a range of reasonableness and were actions a reasonably competent director could adopt; there was no material to infer conduct outside the company's best interests. The objections were held to lack merit and the appeal is dismissed.
The SC dismisses the appellant's objections under Section 47 CPC and the stay application under Order XXI Rule 29, thereby permitting enforcement of the arbitral award to proceed. On maintainability, the Court considered and decided the objections on merits, finding no prima facie case of fraud or breach of fiduciary duty sufficient to render the award inexecutable. Applying the business judgment rule, the Court held that senior management's decisions fell within a range of reasonableness and were actions a reasonably competent director could adopt; there was no material to infer conduct outside the company's best interests. The objections were held to lack merit and the appeal is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.