Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
The HC dismissed the challenge insofar as it sought to impugn the authenticity of the SCN and order on the ground of absence of physical signatures, holding that GST-portal uploads authenticated by the concerned officer's digital key and bearing officer name/designation are valid unless misuse of the digital key is shown. The petition alleging defects including non-issuance of a pre-consultation notice under r.142(1A) and disputes over excess ITC (including claims from cancelled dealers, return-defaulters and non-business/exempt supplies and reconciliation issues) was disposed of with the direction that the petitioner may pursue an appeal under s.107 CGST by 30 November 2025, which shall not be dismissed on limitation and shall be decided on merits.
The HC dismissed the challenge insofar as it sought to impugn the authenticity of the SCN and order on the ground of absence of physical signatures, holding that GST-portal uploads authenticated by the concerned officer's digital key and bearing officer name/designation are valid unless misuse of the digital key is shown. The petition alleging defects including non-issuance of a pre-consultation notice under r.142(1A) and disputes over excess ITC (including claims from cancelled dealers, return-defaulters and non-business/exempt supplies and reconciliation issues) was disposed of with the direction that the petitioner may pursue an appeal under s.107 CGST by 30 November 2025, which shall not be dismissed on limitation and shall be decided on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.