Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT held that the appellant procured clinical trial/study analysis from foreign service providers under a Master Laboratory Agreement and, on making payment in foreign exchange, the services are taxable as Technical Testing and Analysis services under Section 65(105). The Tribunal followed prior precedent that delivery of reports is integral to the service and affirmed the tax demand for the normal limitation period with interest. However, it found that the appellant could have availed CENVAT credit and there was no mens rea to evade tax; accordingly demands raised by invoking the extended period of limitation and all penalties were set aside. Appeal allowed in part.
CESTAT held that the appellant procured clinical trial/study analysis from foreign service providers under a Master Laboratory Agreement and, on making payment in foreign exchange, the services are taxable as Technical Testing and Analysis services under Section 65(105). The Tribunal followed prior precedent that delivery of reports is integral to the service and affirmed the tax demand for the normal limitation period with interest. However, it found that the appellant could have availed CENVAT credit and there was no mens rea to evade tax; accordingly demands raised by invoking the extended period of limitation and all penalties were set aside. Appeal allowed in part.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
