ESOP expenditure allowed as FMV difference; long-term capital gain issue sent back for collector rate determination; deferred income additions disallo...
Appeal allowed; impugned order quashed as regulator failed to prove nexus or manipulative scheme; sale genuine - s.12A(a)-(c), Regs 3(a)-(d),4(1),4(2)...
Appellant's ring-back tone service held OIDAR, taxable domestically for 01.07.2012-31.07.2016; liability confirmed, penalties vacated, remanded for re...
HC held that the statutory three-month period prescribed by Section 73(2), read with Section 73(10) of the CGST Act, is mandatory and affords the minimum time for an assessee to reply to a show cause notice. The revenue's plea that a technical glitch caused reissuance of DRC-01 on 12 Aug 2024 does not cure defective service of the SCN dated 31 May 2024; the SCN was not served within the statutory period and was sent to an incorrect address despite the petitioner's address amendment on 15 May 2024. Consequently the SCN of 28/31 May 2024 and all consequential orders are quashed and the petition is allowed.
HC held that the statutory three-month period prescribed by Section 73(2), read with Section 73(10) of the CGST Act, is mandatory and affords the minimum time for an assessee to reply to a show cause notice. The revenue's plea that a technical glitch caused reissuance of DRC-01 on 12 Aug 2024 does not cure defective service of the SCN dated 31 May 2024; the SCN was not served within the statutory period and was sent to an incorrect address despite the petitioner's address amendment on 15 May 2024. Consequently the SCN of 28/31 May 2024 and all consequential orders are quashed and the petition is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
