Authority rules B+G+31 service apartment is commercial building construction, not multi-storey residential for tax classification under RERA definitio...
Resale price method upheld for distribution; assessee's margins accepted and certain transfer-pricing adjustments deleted due to documented reimbursem...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9821 to 9840 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the respondent authorities' receipt of Rs.10 crores from the petitioner during search/inspection/seizure proceedings was involuntary, without jurisdiction and contrary to the CGST Act. The payment was quashed as illegal, arbitrary and not a voluntary self-ascertainment under Sections 73(5)/74(5). The respondents were directed to refund Rs.10 crores to the petitioner with interest at 6% per annum from 24.03.2023 until actual payment. The refund was ordered to be paid within two months from receipt of a copy of the order. Petition accordingly allowed.
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the respondent authorities' receipt of Rs.10 crores from the petitioner during search/inspection/seizure proceedings was involuntary, without jurisdiction and contrary to the CGST Act. The payment was quashed as illegal, arbitrary and not a voluntary self-ascertainment under Sections 73(5)/74(5). The respondents were directed to refund Rs.10 crores to the petitioner with interest at 6% per annum from 24.03.2023 until actual payment. The refund was ordered to be paid within two months from receipt of a copy of the order. Petition accordingly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
