Revenue neutrality in domestic related-party loans can require deletion of interest transfer pricing adjustments after domestic-transaction verificati...
Pre-enactment land-sale agreements escape stamp-duty value substitution where substantial banking-channel consideration was received before Section 43...
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the respondent authorities' receipt of Rs.10 crores from the petitioner during search/inspection/seizure proceedings was involuntary, without jurisdiction and contrary to the CGST Act. The payment was quashed as illegal, arbitrary and not a voluntary self-ascertainment under Sections 73(5)/74(5). The respondents were directed to refund Rs.10 crores to the petitioner with interest at 6% per annum from 24.03.2023 until actual payment. The refund was ordered to be paid within two months from receipt of a copy of the order. Petition accordingly allowed.
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the respondent authorities' receipt of Rs.10 crores from the petitioner during search/inspection/seizure proceedings was involuntary, without jurisdiction and contrary to the CGST Act. The payment was quashed as illegal, arbitrary and not a voluntary self-ascertainment under Sections 73(5)/74(5). The respondents were directed to refund Rs.10 crores to the petitioner with interest at 6% per annum from 24.03.2023 until actual payment. The refund was ordered to be paid within two months from receipt of a copy of the order. Petition accordingly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
