Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeals, holding that the AO's final invocation of section 194I for non-deduction of TDS on External Development Charges paid to HUDA was unsustainable; though the show-cause notices referenced both sections 194I and 194C, the orders ultimately proceeded under section 194I, which the Tribunal found inapplicable to EDC receipts. The Tribunal held the Department cannot secure an advantage by citing multiple provisions in a show-cause and then enforcing a provision not legally attracted. Consequentially, the Tribunal sustained the assessee's grounds challenging TDS liability and set aside the impugned assessments insofar as they relied on section 194I.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeals, holding that the AO's final invocation of section 194I for non-deduction of TDS on External Development Charges paid to HUDA was unsustainable; though the show-cause notices referenced both sections 194I and 194C, the orders ultimately proceeded under section 194I, which the Tribunal found inapplicable to EDC receipts. The Tribunal held the Department cannot secure an advantage by citing multiple provisions in a show-cause and then enforcing a provision not legally attracted. Consequentially, the Tribunal sustained the assessee's grounds challenging TDS liability and set aside the impugned assessments insofar as they relied on section 194I.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.