Notification No. 12/97-Customs(N.T.) amendment adds Malur Inland Container Depot in Karnataka to authorized locations for import unloading and export ...
Authority rules B+G+31 service apartment is commercial building construction, not multi-storey residential for tax classification under RERA definitio...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeals, holding that the AO's final invocation of section 194I for non-deduction of TDS on External Development Charges paid to HUDA was unsustainable; though the show-cause notices referenced both sections 194I and 194C, the orders ultimately proceeded under section 194I, which the Tribunal found inapplicable to EDC receipts. The Tribunal held the Department cannot secure an advantage by citing multiple provisions in a show-cause and then enforcing a provision not legally attracted. Consequentially, the Tribunal sustained the assessee's grounds challenging TDS liability and set aside the impugned assessments insofar as they relied on section 194I.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeals, holding that the AO's final invocation of section 194I for non-deduction of TDS on External Development Charges paid to HUDA was unsustainable; though the show-cause notices referenced both sections 194I and 194C, the orders ultimately proceeded under section 194I, which the Tribunal found inapplicable to EDC receipts. The Tribunal held the Department cannot secure an advantage by citing multiple provisions in a show-cause and then enforcing a provision not legally attracted. Consequentially, the Tribunal sustained the assessee's grounds challenging TDS liability and set aside the impugned assessments insofar as they relied on section 194I.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
