Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
ITAT upheld the assessee's appeal and directed deletion of the addition treating receipts as income from FTS/FIS. The Tribunal found the payments arose under the same agreement dated 20.02.2017, covering software licence and ancillary support/AMC, and that the factual matrix identical to AY 2019-20 compelled the same conclusion as in the earlier ITAT decision relied upon by the assessee. The Revenue failed to adduce contrary material or distinguish the precedent. Consequently, the addition made by the AO is set aside and the grounds of appeal filed by the assessee are allowed.
ITAT upheld the assessee's appeal and directed deletion of the addition treating receipts as income from FTS/FIS. The Tribunal found the payments arose under the same agreement dated 20.02.2017, covering software licence and ancillary support/AMC, and that the factual matrix identical to AY 2019-20 compelled the same conclusion as in the earlier ITAT decision relied upon by the assessee. The Revenue failed to adduce contrary material or distinguish the precedent. Consequently, the addition made by the AO is set aside and the grounds of appeal filed by the assessee are allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.