Refund claim dismissed as time-barred under s.142(5); non-obstante clause read restrictively, merits not decided, self-assessment payments not mere de...
Assessee's project-completion revenue recognition upheld; income addition deleted under Guidance Note/AS-9 and percentage-completion rules as complian...
ITAT upheld the assessee's appeal and directed deletion of the addition treating receipts as income from FTS/FIS. The Tribunal found the payments arose under the same agreement dated 20.02.2017, covering software licence and ancillary support/AMC, and that the factual matrix identical to AY 2019-20 compelled the same conclusion as in the earlier ITAT decision relied upon by the assessee. The Revenue failed to adduce contrary material or distinguish the precedent. Consequently, the addition made by the AO is set aside and the grounds of appeal filed by the assessee are allowed.
ITAT upheld the assessee's appeal and directed deletion of the addition treating receipts as income from FTS/FIS. The Tribunal found the payments arose under the same agreement dated 20.02.2017, covering software licence and ancillary support/AMC, and that the factual matrix identical to AY 2019-20 compelled the same conclusion as in the earlier ITAT decision relied upon by the assessee. The Revenue failed to adduce contrary material or distinguish the precedent. Consequently, the addition made by the AO is set aside and the grounds of appeal filed by the assessee are allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.