Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT affirmed deletion of an income addition and ruled in favour of the taxpayer, holding that reimbursements received from AEs for IT/support services constituted cost-to-cost allocations without profit and therefore did not constitute Fee for Included Services under the India-USA DTAA. The Tribunal found the "make-available" nexus absent because the services (desktop application training and routine IT administration) did not enable AEs to independently exploit any proprietary technology, and the AO failed to make requisite enquiries or rebut the taxpayer's factual record or the Master Inter-Company Services Agreement. Applying the coordinate bench precedent, the Tribunal concluded the AO's reliance on the taxpayer's own submissions was insufficient and deleted the addition.
ITAT affirmed deletion of an income addition and ruled in favour of the taxpayer, holding that reimbursements received from AEs for IT/support services constituted cost-to-cost allocations without profit and therefore did not constitute Fee for Included Services under the India-USA DTAA. The Tribunal found the "make-available" nexus absent because the services (desktop application training and routine IT administration) did not enable AEs to independently exploit any proprietary technology, and the AO failed to make requisite enquiries or rebut the taxpayer's factual record or the Master Inter-Company Services Agreement. Applying the coordinate bench precedent, the Tribunal concluded the AO's reliance on the taxpayer's own submissions was insufficient and deleted the addition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.