Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the appeal and directed the AO to compute surcharge at 15% on tax (not on tax-plus-surcharge) applicable to the assessee's income, rejecting the AO's imposition of 37%; the Tribunal held that "slab" references income, MMR refers to the highest income slab under the Finance Act, and surcharge rates derive from the Finance Act rather than sections 164/167B/2(29C) alone. The assessee, an AOP with total income exceeding Rs.5 crore (including dividend income) under the new tax regime, satisfies Finance Act conditions for 15% surcharge; consequential relief was ordered in favour of the assessee.
ITAT allowed the appeal and directed the AO to compute surcharge at 15% on tax (not on tax-plus-surcharge) applicable to the assessee's income, rejecting the AO's imposition of 37%; the Tribunal held that "slab" references income, MMR refers to the highest income slab under the Finance Act, and surcharge rates derive from the Finance Act rather than sections 164/167B/2(29C) alone. The assessee, an AOP with total income exceeding Rs.5 crore (including dividend income) under the new tax regime, satisfies Finance Act conditions for 15% surcharge; consequential relief was ordered in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
