The accused denied bail over alleged GST credential misuse to commit Rs.1,09,11,404 fraud involving multiple proprietorships; investigation to continu...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9701 to 9720 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the appellant's appeal, holding that remuneration paid by a partnership to a partner falls within section 28(v) as business income, and therefore expenditures incurred wholly and exclusively for earning that remuneration are deductible under sections 32 and 37. The Tribunal applied the rule of consistency, noting prior allowance of similar deductions (e.g., motor car depreciation) to the appellant and allowance of identical claims to the co-partner in the impugned year, and found no basis to deny the deduction in the assessment under challenge. The assessment order is set aside to the extent it disallowed business-related expenditures claimed against salary/remuneration received from the partnership.
ITAT allowed the appellant's appeal, holding that remuneration paid by a partnership to a partner falls within section 28(v) as business income, and therefore expenditures incurred wholly and exclusively for earning that remuneration are deductible under sections 32 and 37. The Tribunal applied the rule of consistency, noting prior allowance of similar deductions (e.g., motor car depreciation) to the appellant and allowance of identical claims to the co-partner in the impugned year, and found no basis to deny the deduction in the assessment under challenge. The assessment order is set aside to the extent it disallowed business-related expenditures claimed against salary/remuneration received from the partnership.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
