Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT held that the imported "Twaron Para Aramid Pulp" constitutes textile flock/dust within CTI 5601 30 00, not wadding under CTI 5601 22 00, and upheld the differential duty with interest accordingly. However, the Tribunal found no evidence of collusion, wilful misstatement or suppression to justify invocation of extended limitation under s.28(4) or imposition of penalty under s.114A; those measures were set aside. The appeals are allowed in part: classification under CTI 5601 30 00 is affirmed, while demands for duty under the extended period and penalties are quashed. Matters are remitted to the adjudicating authorities solely for computation of duty and interest within the normal limitation period.
CESTAT held that the imported "Twaron Para Aramid Pulp" constitutes textile flock/dust within CTI 5601 30 00, not wadding under CTI 5601 22 00, and upheld the differential duty with interest accordingly. However, the Tribunal found no evidence of collusion, wilful misstatement or suppression to justify invocation of extended limitation under s.28(4) or imposition of penalty under s.114A; those measures were set aside. The appeals are allowed in part: classification under CTI 5601 30 00 is affirmed, while demands for duty under the extended period and penalties are quashed. Matters are remitted to the adjudicating authorities solely for computation of duty and interest within the normal limitation period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.