Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT allowed the appeals of the anonymized appellants and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. The Tribunal found that Condition No. 47A of Notification No. 06/2002-C.E., as amended by N/N. 47/2002, was complied with by production of a district magistrate's certificate evidencing intended use of the pipes in a sanctioned water supply scheme; accordingly the assessee was entitled to exemption. A demand under Section 11D was held unsustainable because the goods were exempted and invoices did not separately reflect duty; prior Tribunal precedent applicable to the facts was followed. Consequentially, demands and penalties against the appellant-entity and its senior officer were set aside.
CESTAT allowed the appeals of the anonymized appellants and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. The Tribunal found that Condition No. 47A of Notification No. 06/2002-C.E., as amended by N/N. 47/2002, was complied with by production of a district magistrate's certificate evidencing intended use of the pipes in a sanctioned water supply scheme; accordingly the assessee was entitled to exemption. A demand under Section 11D was held unsustainable because the goods were exempted and invoices did not separately reflect duty; prior Tribunal precedent applicable to the facts was followed. Consequentially, demands and penalties against the appellant-entity and its senior officer were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
