Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT allowed the appeals of the anonymized appellants and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. The Tribunal found that Condition No. 47A of Notification No. 06/2002-C.E., as amended by N/N. 47/2002, was complied with by production of a district magistrate's certificate evidencing intended use of the pipes in a sanctioned water supply scheme; accordingly the assessee was entitled to exemption. A demand under Section 11D was held unsustainable because the goods were exempted and invoices did not separately reflect duty; prior Tribunal precedent applicable to the facts was followed. Consequentially, demands and penalties against the appellant-entity and its senior officer were set aside.
CESTAT allowed the appeals of the anonymized appellants and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. The Tribunal found that Condition No. 47A of Notification No. 06/2002-C.E., as amended by N/N. 47/2002, was complied with by production of a district magistrate's certificate evidencing intended use of the pipes in a sanctioned water supply scheme; accordingly the assessee was entitled to exemption. A demand under Section 11D was held unsustainable because the goods were exempted and invoices did not separately reflect duty; prior Tribunal precedent applicable to the facts was followed. Consequentially, demands and penalties against the appellant-entity and its senior officer were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
