Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC disposed the petition and directed the Respondent to expeditiously adjudicate the Petitioner's IGST refund applications. The court held that refunds must be processed strictly in accordance with the statutory scheme and timelines; where the Department failed to issue a deficiency memo within the prescribed period, the Petitioner is entitled to interest for the resultant delay. Simultaneously, the court noted the Petitioner's own inordinate delay in responding to the deficiency memo and required the Respondent to account for that delay when quantifying interest. The HC ordered prompt final decision on the refund claims consistent with the Act and Rules.
The HC disposed the petition and directed the Respondent to expeditiously adjudicate the Petitioner's IGST refund applications. The court held that refunds must be processed strictly in accordance with the statutory scheme and timelines; where the Department failed to issue a deficiency memo within the prescribed period, the Petitioner is entitled to interest for the resultant delay. Simultaneously, the court noted the Petitioner's own inordinate delay in responding to the deficiency memo and required the Respondent to account for that delay when quantifying interest. The HC ordered prompt final decision on the refund claims consistent with the Act and Rules.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
