Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
The HC held that a provisional attachment effected under s.83 of the KGST/CGST Act expired on completion of the statutory one-year period and that a subsequent attachment purportedly made the following day was ultra vires, without jurisdiction and void ab initio. The second provisional attachment was quashed as illegal and arbitrary. The petition was allowed and disposed of; the petitioner is entitled to operate the bank account previously subject to attachment. The court treated the expired first order as terminating the authority to continue or renew provisional attachment beyond the maximum statutory period, rendering any post-expiry measure ineffective.
The HC held that a provisional attachment effected under s.83 of the KGST/CGST Act expired on completion of the statutory one-year period and that a subsequent attachment purportedly made the following day was ultra vires, without jurisdiction and void ab initio. The second provisional attachment was quashed as illegal and arbitrary. The petition was allowed and disposed of; the petitioner is entitled to operate the bank account previously subject to attachment. The court treated the expired first order as terminating the authority to continue or renew provisional attachment beyond the maximum statutory period, rendering any post-expiry measure ineffective.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
