Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2741 to 2760 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that a provisional attachment effected under s.83 of the KGST/CGST Act expired on completion of the statutory one-year period and that a subsequent attachment purportedly made the following day was ultra vires, without jurisdiction and void ab initio. The second provisional attachment was quashed as illegal and arbitrary. The petition was allowed and disposed of; the petitioner is entitled to operate the bank account previously subject to attachment. The court treated the expired first order as terminating the authority to continue or renew provisional attachment beyond the maximum statutory period, rendering any post-expiry measure ineffective.
The HC held that a provisional attachment effected under s.83 of the KGST/CGST Act expired on completion of the statutory one-year period and that a subsequent attachment purportedly made the following day was ultra vires, without jurisdiction and void ab initio. The second provisional attachment was quashed as illegal and arbitrary. The petition was allowed and disposed of; the petitioner is entitled to operate the bank account previously subject to attachment. The court treated the expired first order as terminating the authority to continue or renew provisional attachment beyond the maximum statutory period, rendering any post-expiry measure ineffective.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
